Designing Production-Grade RAG Pipelines: What Actually Breaks in the Real World

Dec 202512 min readSarthak Srivastav

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is easy to prototype but notoriously difficult to harden for production. A basic tutorial setup—PDF to chunks to vector DB to LLM—works fine for 10 documents. But when you scale to 10,000 documents with concurrent users, the cracks start to show.

In this deep dive, I’ll walk through the specific points where standard RAG pipelines fail and how to engineer around them.

1. The Retrieval Quality Bottleneck

The most common failure mode isn't the LLM hallucinating—it's the retrieval step failing to find relevant context.

The Problem: Naive Chunking

Splitting text by character count (e.g., every 500 chars) often severs semantic meaning. A header might end up in one chunk and its related content in another.

The Fix: Semantic Chunking & Sliding Windows

Instead of hard breaks, use overlapping windows (e.g., 500 tokens with 50 overlap) to preserve context boundaries. Even better, use structure-aware chunking (Markdown/HTML parsing) to keep paragraphs and code blocks intact.

2. Embedding Mismatch (The "Lost in Space" Problem)

Your user asks "How do I reset my password?", but your vector DB returns results about "password security policies". Why? Because they share semantic similarity in vector space, even if they address different intents.

The Fix: Hybrid Search (Keywords + Vectors)

Pure vector search captures meaning, but keyword search (BM25) captures specificity. A production pipeline must rank results using both.

typescript
// Pseudo-code for Hybrid Search
const vectorResults = await pinecone.query({ vector: embedding, topK: 20 });
const keywordResults = await elastic.search({ query: userInput, topK: 20 });
const finalResults = rankFusion(vectorResults, keywordResults);

3. The Latency Trap

Chaining an embedding call (200ms) + vector search (100ms) + LLM generation (2s+) creates a sluggish UI.

The Fix: Optimistic UI & Streaming

Never make the user stare at a spinner. streaming the response token-by-token is mandatory. Additionally, consider "pre-retrieval": start fetching context while the user is still typing their question (simpler for suggested queries).

Conclusion

Building a demo RAG is a weekend project. Building a production RAG is a discipline. Focus on observability—log your retrieval scores, track user feedback (thumbs up/down), and iterate on your chunking strategy. The model is the engine, but data engineering is the fuel.

Tags

RAGAIVector SearchSystem Design